Cognitive Study · Participant Results
A THANK YOU TO OUR PARTICIPANTS

Study results
summary.

Over one week, 32 of you let us measure your attention, memory, and well‑being before and after the Quantum Upgrade brain‑support frequency was switched on. Here is what the data showed — in plain language.

THE STUDY AT A GLANCE

A 7‑day study with 32 completers.

Each participant served as their own comparison — we looked at how you changed from your own baseline. There was no placebo group; this was a foundational, single‑arm study designed to find a signal worth investigating further.

HOW THE WEEK UNFOLDED

Three moments, three measurements.

1
DAY 1
Baseline

You completed cognitive tasks and a self‑report survey before anything was switched on.

2
WITHIN 7 DAYS
Activation

The Sponsor remotely activated the Quantum Upgrade frequency. You re‑tested that same day to capture any immediate effect.

3
DAY 7
End of study

You repeated every measurement one last time, so we could see whether anything had settled in.

THE HEADLINE

Overall thinking measurably improved by Day 7.

Right after activation, scores hadn't moved yet. But by the end of the week the overall cognitive composite had risen — a small‑to‑moderate, statistically significant gain.

ACUTE (DAY OF ACTIVATION)
+0.00
IQ‑equivalent points · not statistically significant (p = 0.20)
DAY 7
+0.00
IQ‑equivalent points · significant (p = 0.033)

The signal built quietly across the week, rather than appearing the moment the frequency switched on.

WHERE THE CHANGE CAME FROM

One domain led the way — attention.

We measured four cognitive domains. The Day‑7 gain was driven almost entirely by Concentration. Memory was essentially unchanged. Reasoning and Verbal nudged upward without reaching significance on their own.

DAY‑7 EFFECT SIZE (dz)* Significant after correction
+0.48
Overall (IQ)*
-0.16
Memory
+0.35
Reasoning
+0.98
Concentration*
+0.18
Verbal

Bars show Day‑7 change from baseline. The Concentration result was a large effect (dz = 0.98, p < 0.001) and held up under a second, independent scoring method.

TWO INDEPENDENT MEASURES

The tests and your own words agreed.

Alongside the cognitive tasks, you filled out the PROMIS Cognitive Function survey — a validated way of asking, in plain English, how your thinking felt. By Day 7, those self‑reports had moved in the same direction as the objective scores.

Two different instruments, collected differently, pointing the same way. That kind of agreement is what makes the signal feel real, rather than a quirk of one test.

SELF‑REPORTED COGNITION
+0.00
T‑points on the PROMIS survey · higher = better · p = 0.025
SENSITIVITY CHECK
+0.00
T‑points when one extreme decline is set aside · p = 0.007. The result holds either way; we report the more conservative number.

SAFETY & THE BODY

Quiet on the inside, well tolerated throughout.

0 / 19
Oura ring metrics changed significantly

Sleep, activity and heart‑related readings stayed steady all week. The mental change wasn't mirrored in the body signals the ring can see — which is itself interesting, and informs where to look next.

0
Adverse events reported

No one withdrew for a safety reason, and your wearable readings stayed within normal patterns throughout activation.

A FEW STORIES INSIDE THE NUMBERS

Not everyone moved the same way.

Averages tell one story; individuals tell another. Here are three patterns we saw among the strongest responders — shared anonymously, with no identifying details.

ONSET + PERSISTENCE
Sustained improvers

Gained right after activation and held — or grew — through Day 7. The cleanest pattern in the dataset.

+5.89
Best acute
+5.46
Best Day 7
+8.91
Self‑report
TOOK A FEW DAYS
Delayed responders

Little to nothing on the day of activation, then a clear gain by Day 7. The pattern that most resembles the study average.

+5.71
Best Day 7
+1.10
Acute (avg)
+8.05
Self‑report
FELT SHARP EARLY
Acute‑only responders

A strong peak right at activation that softened by the end of the week — a transient lift rather than a settled change.

+8.95
Best acute
+2.64
Day 7 (avg)
mixed
Self‑report

Values shown are illustrative highlights from the per‑protocol completers. No personal identifiers, aliases, or user IDs are shared on this page.

IN CLOSING

Over seven quiet days, something measurable shifted.

A small, broad‑based, well‑tolerated improvement in cognition — most concentrated in attention, and reflected in both the tests and your own words. Because there was no placebo group, this is a foundational signal, not a final answer. A randomized, placebo‑controlled replication is the next step to confirm what we saw.

Thank you for being part of it.